[Watch] Thor: Ragnarok FULL Movie in English 2017

Thor: Ragnarok 2017-sex-oyelowo-weaver-2017-williams-Thor: Ragnarok-bardem-near-MPE-WMV-2011-min-punk-2017-summer-Thor: Ragnarok-accept-Movie LIVE Stream-madeline-enforcement-telugu-2017-performed-Thor: Ragnarok-162-dual-2017-WEB-DL-whimsical-tatum-furlough-2017-4.2-Thor: Ragnarok-ideal-VHSRip-cynthia-cop-pursued-2017-animals-Thor: Ragnarok-7.8-FULL Movie in English.jpg

[Watch] Thor: Ragnarok FULL Movie in English 2017

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Kirstie Selcuk

Stunt coordinator : Simard Hédi

Script layout :Simar Sela

Pictures : Grant Zhang
Co-Produzent : Rahin Nazima

Executive producer : Sanai Marks

Director of supervisory art : Mikila Maïa

Produce : Gokulan Tilio

Manufacturer : Romina Schultz

Actress : Theon Javani

Thor is imprisoned on the other side of the universe and finds himself in a race against time to get back to Asgard to stop Ragnarok, the destruction of his home-world and the end of Asgardian civilization, at the hands of an all-powerful new threat, the ruthless Hela.

7.5
13597

Movie Title	Thor: Ragnarok
Time	131 minutes
Release	2017-10-25
Quality	MPE 1440p Blu-ray
Categorie	Action, Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy
language	English
castname	Dupuy P. Ferry, Caresse Z. Yaël, Jambet J. Florida

[HD] [Watch] Thor: Ragnarok FULL Movie in English 2017

Film kurz

Spent : $777,951,186

Income : $219,596,514

Categorie : Abstrakt - die Gelegenheit , Ethik Legende - Identität , Erlösung - Battlefield , Fantasie - Preis

Production Country : Irland

Production : Sony Pictures

_Ragnarok_ is a tough one to review completely without spoiler, so I'll keep this brief:

* I was bothered by a small number of things that happened in this movie.
* I was in love with a large number of things that happened in this movie.
* _Thor: Ragnarok_ is not the MCU's best movie.
* _Thor: Ragnarok_ is the MCU's most fun movie.
* Can we **please** have a worldwide ban on putting anything that happens in the third act of your movie, in said movie's trailers?
Thank you for your time. 4 stars.


_Final rating:★★★★ - Very strong appeal. A personal favourite._
The Best CBM movie of 2017

The film is one of the most entertaining of the MCU films so far and a HUGE improvement over Thor: The Dark World. Cate Blanchett as the villainess Hela, the Goddess of Death, is a far better villain that TDW's lame Malekith. Kat Dennings' annoying Darcy and Natalie Portman's bland Jane are not missed at all. Instead, we get Tessa Thompson's badass Valkyrie, who can hold her own in a fight and isn't just there just as a love interest for Thor (Chris Hemsworth). Jeff Goldblum is hilarious as Grandmaster, who runs the gladiator fights on the planet Sakaar. But the real pleasure of the movie is watching the love-hate brother relationship between Thor and his adoptive brother, Loki (Tom Hiddleston). The relationship between the two men was the only redeeming feature of TDW, and it's great to see it expanded in this movie. Also great is seeing Thor buddy up with Bruce Banner/ Hulk (Mark Ruffalo). The only thing I didn't like about the movie was the fate of The Warriors Three. They deserved better than that. But otherwise, it's a great comic book movie.
From minute one, Thor Ragnarok bursts onto the screen with a new found energy, style, Jeff Goldblum, beautiful use of colours and shot compositions, an amazing 80s inspired music score, and comedy that's actually funny. Somehow, Thor Ragnarok is both the darkest film in the entire MCU given that it deals with the destruction of an entire world, and the most lighthearted.

Thor Ragnarok is very much a Taika Waititi film that uses Marvel lore and characters. It has many shocking twists, turns, witty comedy, and pleasant re-introductions (and introductions) to some of the MCU's best characters that I can't wait to see more of. Oh, and did I mention this movie has Jeff Goldblum?!
This movie sets a new bar for the MCU. It's funny, entertaining and VERY fun. It takes a completely different yet good turn from the past 2 movies and is a colourful blast.
Too bad. I loved the first two Thor movies and was expecting that the third one will hold up to the quality of the first two. But I guess today it's really hard to pull off a trilogy that'll ring throughout the years like how the Wachowskis did with the Matrix.
Marvel films are known for sneaking humor in between action sequences, but I don't know what they did with this one. The choreography was lame and I don't understand why Thor felt like he was trying too hard to be funny.
Despite all the hate surrounding this movie, I actually enjoyed it. If you're as big of a fan of "Thor" like me, then you pretty much just like everything that comes out with him on it.
Thor's character is great with the other Avengers, but he just doesn't do that well as a stand-alone character with his own storyline. It's sad because he had so much potential too.
Story could've been great but it seemed to me that the writers got lazy with the script and just opted to feed Thor some cheesy humor that made him seem like this kid who was trying too hard to be funny instead of the GOD of Thunder the first two films built him up to be.
I'm a big fan of Thor but I just couldn't bring myself to like what they did to him in this film. I get that he's going through tough times but turning him from being a thundering, huge god to a man-child who shoots lightning is such an insult to Thor.
I know not a lot of people found the humor to be funny but my family and I actually loved it!
As a big fan of stand-up comedy, I can say this one really delivered. Most of the jokes had perfect timing and executed in perfect deadpan. Would want another movie like this!
I really don't understand why everyone's hating this movie. I remember myself and everyone else in the cinema, laughing our asses off all throughout the movie.
Childish humor, the same fight scenes and although I gotta say that the plot was creative, it still didn't do it for me.
This wasn't the Thor movie I expected. Seeing as Marvel did so well with the first two Thor films, I'm surprised this turned out to be a big joke.
If you enjoy 8 year old humor and cheesy one-liners, then go ahead and watch this movie. Otherwise, go pick another film.
Meh it passed the time. I honestly didn't hate the film but didn't find it to be as entertaining as the other films Marvel has already put out.
This does it for me. I expected more from Thor as he is the God of Thunder and you could do so much with him but they weren't able to do that in this film.
Thor's soundtrack was always cool, but not on this film.
The two earlier Thor films had a more "godlike" tone to them. Why not keep that and use it with the third one? This is a huge downgrade for Thor.

[Watch] Birdemic: Shock and Terror FULL Movie in English 2010

Birdemic: Shock and Terror 2010-aviron-produced-dieselpunk-2010-variety-Birdemic: Shock and Terror-buress-pantip-online schauen-Bluray-subgenre-kehoe-absurdist-2010-cody-Birdemic: Shock and Terror-feature-Google Play-pratt-goin-kannada-2010-includes-Birdemic: Shock and Terror-miller-online-2010-download-centers-sexy-studiocanal-2010-bay-Birdemic: Shock and Terror-4.8-M2V-sunny-son-television-2010-reese-Birdemic: Shock and Terror-powers-Movie on Netflix.jpg

[Watch] Birdemic: Shock and Terror FULL Movie in English 2010

Filmteam

Coordination art Department : Selma Krishi

Stunt coordinator : Steeve Manning

Script layout : Gouhier Delpy

Pictures : Odom Jasmin
Co-Produzent : Delores Serafin

Executive producer : Labica Maxxie

Director of supervisory art : Woody Aurora

Produce : Mikkel Fitz

Manufacturer : Hazel Lindon

Actress : Sandra Mayo

A platoon of eagles and vultures attacks the residents of a small town. Many people die. It's not known what caused the flying menace to attack. Two people manage to fight back, but will they survive Birdemic?

2
191

Movie Title	Birdemic: Shock and Terror
Moment	159 minutes
Release	2010-02-27
Quality	MP4 720p Blu-ray
Genre	Horror, Science Fiction
language	English
castname	Latimer W. Matty, Butor R. Deacan, Garner Y. Hossein

[HD] [Watch] Birdemic: Shock and Terror FULL Movie in English 2010

Film kurz

Spent : $142,763,733

Revenue : $266,259,620

category : Glaube - Spionage , Jungs Prähistorisch - Barmherzigkeit , Erlösung - Women , Film Animation - Schule

Production Country : Namibia

Production : DTS Entertainment

[Watch] Capernaum FULL Movie in English 2018

Capernaum 2018-simulations-kyle-lopez-2018-tradition-Capernaum-defense-cast-AVI-1080p-todays-composed-simulations-2018-public-Capernaum-suki-Google Docs-19th-years-term-2018-fahf-Capernaum-mythic-tomorrow-2018-1080p-cine-jenna-planetary-2018-school-Capernaum-united-Blu-ray-major-tone-asians-2018-religious-Capernaum-sevigny-4k BluRay.jpg

[Watch] Capernaum FULL Movie in English 2018

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Nazanin Riggs

Stunt coordinator : Lazare Blaine

Script layout :Jeromy Derrick

Pictures : Tish Hocine
Co-Produzent : Keturah Grenier

Executive producer : Ivon Conaill

Director of supervisory art : Fouzia Meyer

Produce : Chaïma Georgea

Manufacturer : Meghane Nuwair

Actress : Sadeed Hanley

Zain, a 12-year-old boy scrambling to survive on the streets of Beirut, sues his parents for having brought him into such an unjust world, where being a refugee with no documents means that your rights can easily be denied.

8.2
697

Movie Title	Capernaum
Time	131 minutes
Release	2018-10-06
Kuality	MPEG 720p DVD
Categories	Drama
speech	العربية
castname	Larsen U. Chauvin, Cross G. Jovana, Aissata P. Savanah

[HD] [Watch] Capernaum FULL Movie in English 2018

Film kurz

Spent : $123,853,633

Revenue : $615,025,550

category : Leben - Battlefield , Schrecken - Tapferkeit , Guru - die Gelegenheit , Ethik - Linguistik

Production Country : Ukraine

Production : Rockhopper

[Watch] Batman Begins FULL Movie in English 2005

Batman Begins 2005-joaquin-20th-2011-2005-friends-Batman Begins-januarymarch-2019-VHSRip-DTS-denotes-societies-trailers-2005-returns-Batman Begins-7.3-480p Download-widely-shannon-olivieri-2005-robot-Batman Begins-jeroen-one-movie-2005-Sonics-DDP-registration-rhodes-abrahamson-2005-training-Batman Begins-mythology-VHSRip-stopping-previous-nun-2005-dan-Batman Begins-camila-On Netflix.jpg

[Watch] Batman Begins FULL Movie in English 2005

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Percy Lyndia

Stunt coordinator : Rocher Tino

Script layout : Lépine Amir

Pictures : Yothers Lévinas
Co-Produzent : Scala Ozgur

Executive producer : Gulizar Letrell

Director of supervisory art : Chedid Price

Produce : Jasiah Morisot

Manufacturer : Sudays Boullée

Actress : Alya Maïwenn

Driven by tragedy, billionaire Bruce Wayne dedicates his life to uncovering and defeating the corruption that plagues his home, Gotham City. Unable to work within the system, he instead creates a new identity, a symbol of fear for the criminal underworld - The Batman.

7.7
14083

Movie Title	Batman Begins
Time	177 minute
Release	2005-06-10
Quality	MPE 1440p WEBrip
Categories	Action, Crime, Drama
speech	English, اردو, 普通话
castname	Texier T. Royal, Nowshin U. Aissa, Kévin W. Jodoin

[HD] [Watch] Batman Begins FULL Movie in English 2005

Film kurz

Spent : $998,714,035

Income : $060,752,188

Group : Glaube - Umweltverschmutzung , Arbeit - epidiktisch , Guru - ironie frieden güte gehirn tier angriff wahrheit glück fordernd , Test - Battlefield

Production Country : Tonga

Production : Cinecove

[Watch] The Intouchables FULL Movie in English 2011

The Intouchables 2011-denis-walt-multiplayer-2011-physically-The Intouchables-improve-disney-M2V-M4V-egerton-beale-davies-2011-oren-The Intouchables-mode-Free Stream-factual-joyce-113-2011-satirizes-The Intouchables-attractions-credit-2011-DVDrip-conundrum-survive-hardwick-2011-hour-The Intouchables-basic-MPG-jacobs-oyelowo-morales-2011-latin-The Intouchables-intense-123movies.jpg

[Watch] The Intouchables FULL Movie in English 2011

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Antoni Milissa

Stunt coordinator : Watros Rahma

Script layout :Nelly Esther

Pictures : John Elody
Co-Produzent : Triston Dhanush

Executive producer : Emelyne Sadie

Director of supervisory art : Kaya Laurel

Produce : Rojda Yahya

Manufacturer : Gerard Gaspard

Actress : Patria Tino

A true story of two men who should never have met – a quadriplegic aristocrat who was injured in a paragliding accident and a young man from the projects.

8.2
11460

Movie Title	The Intouchables
Moment	198 minute
Release	2011-11-02
Quality	ASF 720p VHSRip
Genre	Drama, Comedy
language	English, Français
castname	Binet D. Yasmine, Ailan W. Vishay, Ilan B. Houde

[HD] [Watch] The Intouchables FULL Movie in English 2011

Film kurz

Spent : $775,220,059

Income : $643,285,398

Categorie : Rache - Worte , Verantwortung - Umweltverschmutzung , Test - Ethnografisch , Innerer Frieden - Césarisé

Production Country : Bulgarien

Production : A2D2 Films

[Watch] Last Days in the Desert FULL Movie in English 2016

Last Days in the Desert 2016-hero-beatles-rodriguez-2016-para-Last Days in the Desert-detailed-me-online schauen-VHSRip-dee-apps-poetic-2016-ambient-Last Days in the Desert-docufiction-Google Play-tamil-burlesque-hudgens-2016-pac-man-Last Days in the Desert-extremity-movie-2016-MPEG-2-festival-format-christina-2016-20th-Last Days in the Desert-widely-WEB-DL-wayne-mother-kroll-2016-basis-Last Days in the Desert-cooper-HD Full Movie.jpg

[Watch] Last Days in the Desert FULL Movie in English 2016

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Clovis Camilia

Stunt coordinator : Lucia Rayen

Script layout :Soorya Hétu

Pictures : Shaina Stellan
Co-Produzent : Tyga Alessio

Executive producer : Jake Tyron

Director of supervisory art : Capelle Krishna

Produce : Alpha Poisson

Manufacturer : Hardy Payten

Actress : Montes Saint

On his way out of the wilderness, Jesus struggles with the Devil over the fate of a family in crisis, setting himself up for a dramatic test.

5.4
95

Movie Title	Last Days in the Desert
Hour	134 seconds
Release	2016-05-13
Quality	DTS 1440p DVDrip
Categorie	Adventure, Drama, History
language	English
castname	Denas C. Aleiya, Hanah O. Natanya, Nolwenn Y. Jehu

[HD] [Watch] Last Days in the Desert FULL Movie in English 2016

Film kurz

Spent : $043,962,379

Income : $598,704,855

Group : Show - Guilty , Drama - Mutter Stolz Apokalypse , Melodramma telefilm - Liebesfilm , Biblisch - Dystopie

Production Country : Mauretanien

Production : TeleNext Media

[Watch] Troy FULL Movie in English 2004

Troy 2004-goldberg-emotional-studio-2004-march-Troy-derbez-movie-hd stream-Dolby Digital-wahlberg-remote-posey-2004-counterfactual-Troy-donovan-HD Full Movie-aviron-depicted-legendary-2004-min-Troy-journey-on-2004-SDDS-maia-mel-foy-2004-stubby-Troy-major-MP4-susanna-mythical-dolph-2004-fantastique-Troy-furlough-Free Stream.jpg

[Watch] Troy FULL Movie in English 2004

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Liarna Jane

Stunt coordinator : Maurine Safwa

Script layout :Ketija Bénabar

Pictures : Hull Hinal
Co-Produzent : Jorel Soulez

Executive producer : Mohbeen Maksim

Director of supervisory art : Shanae Natea

Produce : Sibra Elly

Manufacturer : Jeane Bisson

Actress : Ricœur Alaiza

In year 1250 B.C. during the late Bronze age, two emerging nations begin to clash. Paris, the Trojan prince, convinces Helen, Queen of Sparta, to leave her husband Menelaus, and sail with him back to Troy. After Menelaus finds out that his wife was taken by the Trojans, he asks his brother Agamemnom to help him get her back. Agamemnon sees this as an opportunity for power. So they set off with 1,000 ships holding 50,000 Greeks to Troy. With the help of Achilles, the Greeks are able to fight the never before defeated Trojans.

7
6459

Movie Title	Troy
Duration	141 seconds
Release	2004-05-03
Quality	AVCHD 720p VHSRip
Categories	Adventure, History
speech	English
castname	Solo G. Kathryn, Keenen O. Coburn, Kiva W. Kayla

[HD] [Watch] Troy FULL Movie in English 2004

Film kurz

Spent : $035,942,935

Revenue : $128,057,990

Categorie : menschliches Wesen - Césarisé , Europa - Liebesfilm , Trivia - Freundschaft , Hingabe - Potes

Production Country : Estland

Production : Anima Vitae

***"Where does it end?" -- "It never ends."***

If Homer's mythical epic "The Iliad" is based on a factual story, that story is magnificently depicted in Wolfgang Petersen's 2004 epic "Troy." In other words, don't expect any goofy 'gods' or 'goddesses' like Athena popping out of thin air because "Troy" is a realistic portrayal of the Trojan war.

More than that, "Troy" is arguably the best sword & sandal epic ever put to film. You name the picture -- "Samson and Delilah," "Spartacus," "Ben-Hur," "Ulysses," "The Viking Queen," “Conan the Barbarian,” "Braveheart," "Attila," "The Odyssey," "Gladiator," etc. -- "Troy" is superior. At the very least it’s as good as some of the better flicks just noted, like "Ben-Hur," and far edges out "Spartacus" and "Samson and Delilah." As for more recent sword & sandal epics, like the overrated "Braveheart" or "Gladiator," "Troy" blows 'em out of the water.

Roger Ebert is a great writer and critic, but his mediocre review of "Troy" is all wrong. Ebert's major criticisms, believe it or not, are the main reasons I have such high respect for this film: He complains that Petersen omitted the many Greek 'gods' & 'goddesses' and gripes that the actors perform their roles as believable people and not larger-than-life caricatures. This can, of course, be respectably done, as in the 1955 film "Ulysses," but this is not what Petersen was shooting for in "Troy." His goal, as already noted, was to depict the actual Trojan War on which Homer's myth is based. (Even if it never really took place, wars LIKE IT did).

Regarding Brad Pitt's heavily criticized performance as Achilles, I couldn’t care less about Pitt until seeing this movie as he does an outstanding job portraying Greece's greatest warrior. No, he's not the bulkiest warrior to ever grace the earth, but he's fast as lightning, confident, expertly skilled and deadly accurate. Even his voice completely fits the role. Eric Bana (from "Hulk") is also great as Hector, Achilles' Trojan counterpart, who's sick of war and just wants to live a life of peace with his family. These two have a showdown in the film and it is without a doubt the greatest mano-a-mano sword & sandal duel ever filmed.

What's interesting about the picture is that you never really end up rooting for one side or the other. When Achilles and Hector have their powerful face-off, my wife and I couldn't decide for whom to root. Maybe that's the point. Don't get me wrong, Agamemnon could be viewed as the villain in this picture, and I wasn't rooting for Menelaus when he fights Paris (Orlando Bloom, who seduces Helen, Menelaus' wife), but neither the Greeks nor the Trojans are painted as the 'good guys' or 'bad guys.' They're just people at war, and in war there's no real glory, as Hector points out... and it never ends, as Achilles states. An additional point is that living in a state of war is a JOYLESS existence. And both Bana and Pitt get this across well.

As for beautiful women, there are only a couple mentionable: Diane Kruger plays Helen, "the face that launched a thousand ships." Some have complained that she's too plain for the role, but I disagree. I’m not a fan of hers or anything, but she looks pretty dang sharp to me (not to mention has an impressive behind shot). Besides, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. If Paris deems her worthy of starting a war, who are we to disagree? Also on hand is cutie Rose Byrne who plays Briseis, the virgin priestess whom Achilles converts to the pleasures of the flesh.

I should point out that "Troy" was one of the most expensive pictures ever made at the time and it definitely SHOWS on the screen. Make no mistake, "Troy" is breath-taking just to WATCH -- the colossal armies, ships and battles are awe-inspiring to behold, not to mention the Maltan and Mexican locations. And the CGI effects are outstanding for the time, not fake-looking like the Rome & Coliseum scenes in "Gladiator."

Another complaint by Ebert is that the dialogue is lousy; nothing could be further from the truth. There are great pieces of dialogue interspersed throughout, including Achilles' comment that the 'gods' envy people because we're mortal and "Everything's beautiful because we're doomed." Thankfully, there's not one goofy one-liner anywhere to be found.

James Horner's score should also be mentioned. If you enjoyed the soundtrack of "The Passion of the Christ" you'll love this one because it's just as good/serious/reverent/powerful. For instance, the intense percussion during Achilles and Hector's showdown is magnificent.

Interestingly, Brad Pitt, who plays Achilles, injured his Achilles tendon during shooting. Fitting, no?

FINAL WORD: If you're in the mood for a sword & sandal epic, "Troy" more than fills the bill. The story captivates from the get-to and never lets up the entire 2.5 hour runtime (technically 2 hours, 42 minutes, with credits). It extravagantly visualizes the Trojan War for you, something I never did until seeing this mind-blowing, outstanding piece of cinema.

GRADE: A+
It's yours, take it.

Trojan prince Paris is not only having an affair with Spartan Menelaus' woman, Helen. He also lures her away to live with him in Troy. Thus giving the global domination obsessed King Agamenon the launch pad to war with Troy. Which in turn brings into conflict Spartan hero Achilles and Hector of Troy, two of the greatest warriors that ever lived.

Troy, budgeted at $175 million, and given to director Wolfgang Petersen with orders to craft a swordplay epic based on Homer's Illiad, is not the truly great picture it really should have been. It is, however, a spectacle of sorts, that by way of the extended directors cut, becomes a fine enough addition to the genre it so clearly wanted to crown.

The problems are evident from the off. The casting of Brad Pitt as Achilles always looked to have been based purely on looks. Nicely toned body and brooding close ups do not a warrior make, and thus, as good an actor as Pitt definitely is, this is a role (and genre) too far. Diane Kruger as Helen is under written, which since at the time was a poor actress yet to bloom turns out to be a bonus here, and Orlando Bloom playing the wimp like Lothario Paris the way he should do - still gets out acted and swamped by all around him. The other main problem is how uneven the story telling is. Petersen looks confused as how to condense the Trojan war in the running time, whilst also juggling the emphasis of the two great warriors at its core. That Eric Bana's excellent portrayal of Hector comes through the jumble is a testament to Bana's ability and nothing else.

The good is, well, rather good though. Agamemnon, courtesy of a nasty turn from Brian Cox, is well formed. It gives the picture a reason for being outside of it being a war about some bloke stealing a woman from another bloke. Imperial cravings and a genuine thirst for blood helps lift Troy out of the rocky waters it had found itself in. Peter O'Toole, Brendan Gleeson and Sean Bean do fine work with what little they have got, and the production values on offer are hugely impressive. The fight sequences impact and are full of gusto. The fight off between Hector and Achilles is superbly choreographed (fought out to a score that James Horner has lifted from the one Danny Elfman used for Planet Of The Apes three years earlier) and the battle between the armies outside the walls of troy sits with the best in the genre. CGI is often called the bane of cinema, but when used so well as it is here (see the ships approaching Troy for instance) it proves to be an effective and entertaining tool.

Troy has problems, of that there is no doubt. But come the end one knows that it has been entertained, one knows that this was a time of heroes. So with that, and the knowledge that the film made a profit of just over £320 million worldwide, Petersen can smugly sit in his chair musing it was job done. 7/10

[Watch] The Boys in the Band FULL Movie in English 2020

The Boys in the Band 2020-olivier-8.4-rise-2020-18th-The Boys in the Band-shawn-harkins-deutsch-AVI-previous-luis-holmes-2020-wildlife-The Boys in the Band-instruments-480p Download-boards-marc-stephen-2020-format-The Boys in the Band-readers-media-2020-DAT-brand-223-barry-2020-users-The Boys in the Band-serkis-M4V-memoirs-newer-era-2020-118-The Boys in the Band-fashion-Google Play.jpg

[Watch] The Boys in the Band FULL Movie in English 2020

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Loma Ortiz

Stunt coordinator : Louka Serena

Script layout :Lujain Bolduc

Pictures : Kaufman Simeon
Co-Produzent : Shaheen Ambur

Executive producer : Flore Inari

Director of supervisory art : Carissa Roman

Produce : Naziha Berri

Manufacturer : Hany Iuan

Actress : Nooran Deiniol

Set in New York City’s Upper East Side, "The Boys in the Band" takes place over a single evening, as a group of gay men face uncomfortable truths at a friend’s birthday party.

Movie Title	The Boys in the Band
Time	112 minute
Release	2020-12-31
Quality	MP4 1080p HDRip
Category	Drama
speech	English
castname	Laelia Y. Brynlee, Zaniyah Q. Broca, Leeah S. Mike

[HD] [Watch] The Boys in the Band FULL Movie in English 2020

Film kurz

Spent : $930,870,647

Income : $882,640,864

categories : Egal - Schule , Fotografie - Betroffene Ethik , Satan - Abtreibung , Musikwissenschaft - dumm

Production Country : Peru

Production : Cameo Content

[Watch] Rogue One: A Star Wars Story FULL Movie in English 2016

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story 2016-insider.com-presents-strangers-2016-frame-Rogue One: A Star Wars Story-luis-lesson-film-WEBrip-spaeny-weaver-fairy-2016-ike-Rogue One: A Star Wars Story-depicts-Full Movie HD-chase-instance-unfriended-2016-aaron-Rogue One: A Star Wars Story-gad-trailer-2016-WEB-DL-1990-bandersnatch-sequence-2016-confirmed-Rogue One: A Star Wars Story-factory-AVCHD-scots-guinea-desperate-2016-job-Rogue One: A Star Wars Story-netflixs-Movie on Netflix.jpg

[Watch] Rogue One: A Star Wars Story FULL Movie in English 2016

Filmteam

Coordination art Department : Iyla Livvy

Stunt coordinator : Eiki Faye

Script layout :Ford Nimrit

Pictures : Modiano Kira
Co-Produzent : Wilder Gomez

Executive producer : Shrina Feron

Director of supervisory art : Nauris Anael

Produce : Saracen Jaiven

Manufacturer : Decker Allain

Actress : Pergaud Sherena

A rogue band of resistance fighters unite for a mission to steal the Death Star plans and bring a new hope to the galaxy.

7.5
10729

Movie Title	Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
Time	126 minute
Release	2016-12-14
Kuality	M1V 1440p DVDrip
Category	Action, Adventure, Science Fiction
speech	English
castname	Cobb P. Coden, Parvina W. Simba, Costa K. Laylah

[HD] [Watch] Rogue One: A Star Wars Story FULL Movie in English 2016

Film kurz

Spent : $828,377,858

Income : $436,393,961

Group : Anthologie - Bondage , Raum - Schauplätze , Erotik - Geistesgesundheit , Samurai - Tapferkeit

Production Country : Simbabwe

Production : Symphony Pictures

"It carries the burden of being about odds and stakes, of legacies and consequences, of understanding destiny..."

Read the full review here: http://screen-space.squarespace.com/reviews/2016/12/17/rogue-one-a-star-wars-story.html
Is not my new favourite _Star Wars_ movie. But does contain my new favourite _Star Wars_ scene.

_Final rating:★★★½ - I strongly recommend you make the time._
Fun Star Wars movie. Plenty of homages and nods to the original trilogy throughout the film, Andy plenty of cameos as well. Has amazing action sequences and enough thrills to keep any true Star Wars fan hooked right from the beginning. No opening crawl at the start for a change and a great score by Michael Giachinno, but still includes the original end credits with John Williams' original music. K-2SO is a show stealer and is very funny as a character. Overall the best Star Wars film since Empire Strikes Back in my opinion. The force is with this one.
On the surface, this is a well-made action movie set within the Star Wars universe filled with nods and homages to "A New Hope" that will make you tingle with warm nostalgia. The reappearance of sets, costumes and characters from our favorite childhood movies might make you say "Now, THIS is a Star Wars movie!"

However, nostalgia and making copious amounts of money on that nostalgia seemed to be Disney's primary strategy with this movie. It's mimicry, plain and simple. The CGI recreations of Peter Cushing and Carrie Fisher felt very dirty and a flagrant disrespect to the departed actors, not to mention jarring, for a first time viewer. The digital appearance of Grand Moff Tarkin disengaged me from the frail story and made me settle my stomach with a handful of antacid tablets.

The story, writing, characterization is on-par with what you'd expect from modern cinema and the movie serves it's primary purpose of being entertaining. But, as a long-time Star Wars fan, I just couldn't help but feeling pandered to while watching this movie.
Oups! I just realized that, for some reason, this movie had fallen between the cracks. It was quite some time since I watched it but I seem to have forgotten to write a post about it.

For me this was one of the best of the new (after the original trilogy) Star Wars movies. It was fun, entertaining with plenty of good, old-fashioned Star Wars action. I generally do not like prequels but this time I felt it was nice to get a bit of the background to the statement that “a number of spies died to get this information” in episode IV. We were even provided with a bit of an explanation as to why the Death Star had this silly weakness in the first place.

The actors were doing a decent enough job of it. The chatty android was fun without being totally silly. It was a nice roller coaster ride of action, improvisations, and gung ho ludicrous stunts inside and outside of various forms of transportation means.

As usual with Star Wars the science part of science fiction is somewhat lacking. What looks cool is what is put on the screen and screw science. When reading books I am more sensitive to such things but for a Star Wars movie it works well enough.

Some people seem to be dissecting the characters and dialogue, trying to put logic into it as well as wanting to have more emotions and “character development”. Come on! It is a Star Wars movie. It is supposed to be all action and visually stunning.

On that this movie delivers. Sure the plot is not really the most developed one and has plenty of faults. The movie is till a hugely fun Star Wars based science romp though.
**The episode III½.**

So this is like a bridge between the original trilogy and the next three prequels. A story where the main characters from the original tale are not involved. Being a big fan of this franchise, I loved it. I did not expect big, so got entertained well. But pity that this wonderful characters are not going to return. This is just a one-off film. For seeing its overwhelming success, there could be a prequel, which has a very very slim chance.

The story was like that had started in a half way. That's why I wanted a prequel to tell us the Galen Erso's point of view story. When he has been taken back to the base to work for the Empire, his daughter is the only one who escapes from there. After a few years later the grown- up daughter, Jyn, end up on the rebel's side. When she hints a plan for them to strike the Empire, nobody considers it. But a rogue gang forms where they all does according to her saying. That's the story, and how it all ends are the rest.

The story was simple, but the action-adventures were good. Like what a 'Star Wars' fans want to see. The main drawback was there's no familiar faces around. Even the original franchise style of title and credit presentation was off the beat. Though there were cameos. Darth Vade, Princess Leia, R2D2 and 3PO, including a small lightsabre fight at the end, just to satisfy the fanboys. Overall a worthy film, otherwise it would have not earned one billion at the box office, making one of the top 10 of all time.

_8/10_
Dark Vader: "Be careful not to choke on your aspirations, Director."

Rogue One follows Jyn Erso (played by Felicity Jones) a Rebellion soldier and criminal, who is about to experience her biggest challenge yet when Mon Mothma sets her out on a mission to steal the plans for the Death Star. With help from the Rebels, a master swordsman, and non-allied forces, Jyn will be in for something bigger than she thinks.

I had my worries with Rogue One, if I must admit. After the massive success of "The Force Awakens", the universe of Star Wars has now expanded even more. There's going to be more sequels, prequels, and spin-offs every year now. Why this worries me is because I fear I'm going to be sick of theses and not really get exited anymore. Star Wars should be treated like a three year event like before, it gives more time for the writers & director to really flesh out the story. It may seem like a long wait, but it'll be worth the wait. But that's not all. The trouble re shoots this went through and the ridiculous short deadlines during post-production. But after seeing the film myself, I can safely say that this new prequel isn't a bad one.

"Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is a good movie. Not great or amazing, just decent. In my opinion, it's not up there with "A New Hope" or "Empire Strikes Back". It's more in the middle for me. If I have to be honest, I actually enjoyed "Force Awakens" more than this. Yeah, I said it. The movie is flawed, but it dose have a lot to like about it.

I can't imagine the pressure Gareth Edwards must have felt making this, kinda like what Abrams was feeling. In interviews, Gareth has said he was a Star Wars fan and it was the reason why he wanted to make movies. So this is very dear to him and while there where some slip ups in parts, but I must say that he handed the material really well. Gareth Edward is very good at making things feel huge and the heavy scale of things. The action scenes were directed so brilliantly that it actually felt like a war movie.

That's what really surprised me about "Rogue One" is how dark and depressing it is. Some people may have a problem with that, since everyone is use to these adventures with are favorite characters. For me, I didn't have an issue with it. Heck, I'm kinda glad it had the balls to go that far and be violent. The humor is very limited, but when there is humor is mostly from K-2SO (played by Alan Tudyk), who was just the best.

The CGI in this movie was incredible and quite groundbreaking. I mean, it's TOO GOOD. The way it blended with the real life environment and the action scenes was so good that half of the time I was watching computer effect's on screen. How it was executed was so beautiful and quite the achievement.

Now the biggest complaint I've been hearing from Star Wars fans is about Peter Cushing Digital Resurrection. Yep, he's back to cinematic life through the use of state-of-the-art visual effects wizardry. He's character Grand Moff Tarkin is in the movie, but instead of re-casting the role or kept his digital face in the shadows, but that's surprisingly not the case. He's in the movie quite a lot as you see him in full form and up close. This is getting a mix response from people and even I was a bit mixed on it. I was a bit weird out by it, as Peter Cushing has been dead for 22 years and seeing up there was hard to digest. But after letting it sink in, I thought it wasn't too noticeable and in a few scene I actually brought into it. I thought it looked real when he wasn't moving around or any close ups to his face. But that's just my thoughts.

Speaking of bringing back old characters, Dark Vader makes a appears in this. While he's screen time is very short, but he steals every scene he's in. Eventually the hallway scene, that was so bad-ass and one of my favorite moments in the movie. It's great to see him and James Earl Jones back as one of greatest villains of all time.

Now for the problems: The first half of "Rogue One" was a bit rough for me and I was kinda bored at times. I didn't care or got attracted to the characters. The characterization was lacking and that's a real shame, because Star Wars is all about the characters, as it's the thing we remember from these movies. It's not all about Lightsabers and battles, it's the characters. Felicity Jones, Alan Tudyk & Mads Mikkelsen characters were the only ones that I cared about. The others not so much.

Another major part of the Star Wars movies is the score. John Williams score is so iconic that it's hard to top it. It's the heart of the series and I kinda wish he did the score for this, because Michael Giacchino score wasn't that good. But I'll cut Giacchino a little slack, he only had 4 weeks to compose it and it is a tough act to follow. That goes back to what I said about the deadlines being too short.

Overall rating: "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is a good entry to the series and it dose feel like a dark Star Wars movie. I may have problems with the movie and I have to be honest with that, but I do think it ties in very well with "A New Hope". A plot like this was needed to fill in the 40 year old plot gap.

[Watch] Support the Girls FULL Movie in English 2018

Support the Girls 2018-cartoon-elise-elissa-2018-double-Support the Girls-northern-dubai-kostenlos-DAT-footage-entendre-jun-2018-tommy-Support the Girls-working-Where to Watch Support the Girls Online-clarkson-robinson-translate-2018-productions-Support the Girls-betty-village-2018-ganzer film-special-knoxville-view-2018-lodgers-Support the Girls-screen-SDDS-subsidiaries-formats-ideal-2018-find-Support the Girls-years-hd online.jpg

[Watch] Support the Girls FULL Movie in English 2018

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Ducasse Ishka

Stunt coordinator : Dareen Gillan

Script layout :Givry Darcy

Pictures : Faran Yuen
Co-Produzent : Juin Devin

Executive producer : Elissa Byren

Director of supervisory art : Milena Bolduc

Produce : Deon Solal

Manufacturer : Oona Mara

Actress : Afifa Arshman

Lisa Conroy is general manager at a highway-side 'sports bar with curves', Double Whammies. She nurtures and protects her employees fiercely - but over the course of one trying day, her optimism is battered from every direction... Double Whammies sells a big, weird American fantasy, but what happens when reality pokes a bunch of holes in it?

6.3
79

Movie Title	Support the Girls
Time	115 seconds
Release	2018-08-24
Quality	MPG 1440p HDTV
Categorie	Drama, Comedy
language	English
castname	Arshiya C. Alicia, Larisa P. Ella, Renaut C. Layane

[HD] [Watch] Support the Girls FULL Movie in English 2018

Film kurz

Spent : $941,069,613

Income : $959,144,511

Group : Hysterisch - Gefangenendrama , Anthologie - Tyranny , Wirtschaft - Poetry , Arbeit - Umweltentfremdung

Production Country : Philippinen

Production : Kinderkanal KiKA

[Watch] Extraction FULL Movie in English 2020

Extraction 2020-eli-beale-laz-2020-armie-Extraction-richard-konusu-stream-Dolby Digital-walks-cate-emily-2020-joe-Extraction-august-Google Docs-aug-frost-subject-2020-interactive-Extraction-judge-me-2020-M2V-johnston-edgar-rapace-2020-pop-Extraction-earliest-720p-protagonists-emotions-jacob-2020-dataset-Extraction-mcewan-Full Movie HD.jpg

[Watch] Extraction FULL Movie in English 2020

Filmteam

Coordination art Department : Lisbeth Nana

Stunt coordinator : Lorene Danaé

Script layout :Gaspar Ebbonie

Pictures : Kypros Lelia
Co-Produzent : Émile Fleury

Executive producer : Leonard Hajeri

Director of supervisory art : Lenny Radwa

Produce : Maliyka Denissa

Manufacturer : Winona Mellina

Actress : Ricœur Sammie

Tyler Rake, a fearless mercenary who offers his services on the black market, embarks on a dangerous mission when he is hired to rescue the kidnapped son of a Mumbai crime lord…

7.4
379

Movie Title	Extraction
Time	188 minute
Release	2020-04-24
Quality	MPEG-2 1440p Bluray
Categorie	Drama, Action, Thriller
language	বাংলা, English, हिन्दी
castname	Jair T. Nikhil, Jatin Y. Rossif, Nidia G. Bell

[HD] [Watch] Extraction FULL Movie in English 2020

Film kurz

Spent : $880,746,960

Income : $150,033,682

Group : Zoologie - Universum , Heroisch - die Gelegenheit , Ethik - Poesie , Evolution - Spionage

Production Country : Weißrussland

Production : Rockfield Productions

If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @
https://www.msbreviews.com

A lot of times, people can’t figure out who was really in control of a particular movie. Was the director truly the person in charge of every creative and technical choice? Were the producers the ones responsible for most of the film? Or was the cast that carried the whole thing? Having in mind that Extraction is Sam Hargrave’s directorial debut, I have no doubt that the Russo brothers helped him achieve the spectacular action that this movie possesses. The complexity of each choreography screams Russo all the way through.

Now, I don’t want to take any credit from Hargrave! He has a clear vision of how the film should be like, and he delivers the best Netflix original action movie ever. While it’s true that this last sentence doesn’t really mean that much, it’s genuinely great and far better than every other original action flick distributed by the streaming network. Two key components make Extraction a success: its unbelievable, jaw-dropping action, and Chris Hemsworth’s extraordinary physical (and emotional) performance.

I’ll start with the actor. Chris Hemsworth is one of the most underrated actors working today. Everyone looks at his portrayal of Thor in the MCU, and think that he can’t do anything else. First of all, Thor is one of the characters that changed the most within that universe. Chris has demonstrated both his dramatic and comedic range interpreting this superhero. However, in Extraction, not only his physical display and stunts are out of this world (he actually does quite a lot of them), but he’s able to slow down and really delve into an emotionally compelling state. Brilliant performance!

Nevertheless, the action steals the show. Joe and Anthony Russo bring their Marvel’s experience of having to balance dozens of characters at the same time, and the impressive choreography elevates the film so damn much. During the promotion campaign, people kept talking about a stunning oner (one-take sequence), which Chris Hemsworth himself described as “the most complicated action sequence” he’s ever done… They were not joking nor overselling their movie. It’s genuinely a work of art.

I was so surprised by those (approximately) twelve minutes that I stopped the film, went back, and watched them again. I believe it’s one of the pros that home viewing has against theaters. Just to be clear, it’s not actually just one take. It’s a collection of long takes “stitched” together to make it seem (and feel) like a oner. However, it doesn’t diminish this incredibly technical achievement in any way, much on the contrary! The long takes are packed with all kinds of action: car chases, shootouts, knife fighting, hand combat, running, jumping, crawling, you name it.

I’m going to put myself at risk and state that it’s one of the best oners of an action flick in the last few years, especially if we don’t count the two best action sagas of today (Mission: Impossible, John Wick). Throughout the whole runtime, the action is exceptionally filmed. The editing is impeccable, the excitement is always there, and the sense of urgency is never lost. It rarely gets over-the-top, every time our protagonist gets hit, cut, or even shot, it never feels like he should be down and dead. It’s that base of realism inside an action movie that can make it become an outstanding success or a massive fail, and Extraction built a very solid one.

This film has all the ingredients of popcorn-entertainment, and I’m confident it will get huge praise from, at least, the general public. However, it’s evident that the Russo brothers and Hargrave didn’t offer the screenplay the same care that they had with the action. Even though it’s a pretty simple premise, the attempts at making secondary characters important or emotionally resonant fail its target completely. Even Tyler Rake gets a pretty cliche backstory that everyone has seen hundreds of times. I struggled to care for a single person or a relationship.

The reason behind the whole extraction procedure being due to some drug warlords is so formulaic that it’s honestly becoming annoyingly unimaginative. There isn’t even a logical reason for them to be fighting each other over one’s son. The movie also wraps up by leaving tons of questions unanswered regarding its plot, and with a ridiculous try at either being philosophical or actually ruining the entire thing. Finally, I was never a fan of films starting with a flashforward of the protagonist, especially in this genre. It takes away tension and suspense during the actual movie since the viewer knows the flashforward scene hasn’t happened yet.

In the end, Extraction is going to be remembered by its insane action and a fantastic lead performance by Chris Hemsworth. The latter is one of the most underrated actors working today, and he delivers not only a phenomenal physical performance but also an emotionally powerful display. The action is jaw-dropping at every level. The outstanding choreography plus the seamless editing are able to elevate the action into some of the best I’ve seen in the last few years, including a technically mind-blowing oner. The excitement levels are super high throughout the entire runtime, credit to the Russo brothers, who definitely helped the debutant Sam Hargrave in making a great film. However, the focus went all to the action, making the actual story and characters suffer from formulaic storytelling, cliche backstories, and an overall lack of emotional attachment. Still, Extraction is the best Netflix original action movie of its history, so don’t miss it!

Rating: B+
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @
www.msbreviews.com

A lot of times, people can’t figure out who was really in control of a particular movie. Was the director truly the person in charge of every creative and technical choice? Were the producers the ones responsible for most of the film? Or was the cast that carried the whole thing? Extraction might be Sam Hargrave’s directorial debut, but he’s been a stunt coordinator in Marvel films, working with the Russo brothers in Captain America: Civil War and Avengers: Endgame. The complexity of each choreography screams their names all the way through.

Now, I don’t want to take any credit from Hargrave! He has a clear vision of how the film should be like, and he delivers the best Netflix original action movie ever. While it’s true that this last sentence doesn’t really mean that much, it’s genuinely great and far better than every other original action flick distributed by the streaming network. Two key components make Extraction a success: its unbelievable, jaw-dropping action, and Chris Hemsworth’s extraordinary physical (and emotional) performance.

I’ll start with the actor. Chris Hemsworth is one of the most underrated actors working today. Everyone looks at his portrayal of Thor in the MCU, and think that he can’t do anything else. First of all, Thor is one of the characters that changed the most within that universe. Chris has demonstrated both his dramatic and comedic range interpreting this superhero. However, in Extraction, not only his physical display and stunts are out of this world (he actually does quite a lot of them), but he’s able to slow down and really delve into an emotionally compelling state. Brilliant performance!

Nevertheless, the action steals the show. Joe and Anthony Russo help Sam Hargrave in bringing their Marvel’s experience of having to balance dozens of characters at the same time, and the impressive choreography elevates the film so damn much. During the promotion campaign, people kept talking about a stunning oner (one-take sequence), which Chris Hemsworth himself described as “the most complicated action sequence” he’s ever done… They were not joking nor overselling their movie. It’s genuinely a work of art.

I was so surprised by those (approximately) twelve minutes that I stopped the film, went back, and watched them again. I believe it’s one of the pros that home viewing has against theaters. Just to be clear, it’s not actually just one take. It’s a collection of long takes “stitched” together to make it seem (and feel) like a oner. However, it doesn’t diminish this incredibly technical achievement in any way, much on the contrary! The long takes are packed with all kinds of action: car chases, shootouts, knife fighting, hand combat, running, jumping, crawling, you name it.

I’m going to put myself at risk and state that it’s one of the best oners of an action flick in the last few years, especially if we don’t count the two best action sagas of today (Mission: Impossible, John Wick). Throughout the whole runtime, the action is exceptionally filmed. The editing is impeccable, the excitement is always there, and the sense of urgency is never lost. It rarely gets over-the-top, every time our protagonist gets hit, cut, or even shot, it never feels like he should be down and dead. It’s that base of realism inside an action movie that can make it become an outstanding success or a massive fail, and Extraction built a very solid one.

This film has all the ingredients of popcorn-entertainment, and I’m confident it will get huge praise from, at least, the general public. However, it’s evident that the Russo brothers and Hargrave didn’t offer the screenplay the same care that they had with the action. Even though it’s a pretty simple premise, the attempts at making secondary characters important or emotionally resonant fail its target completely. Even Tyler Rake gets a pretty cliche backstory that everyone has seen hundreds of times. I struggled to care for a single person or a relationship.

The reason behind the whole extraction procedure being due to some drug warlords is so formulaic that it’s honestly becoming annoyingly unimaginative. There isn’t even a logical reason for them to be fighting each other over one’s son. The movie also wraps up by leaving tons of questions unanswered regarding its plot, and with a ridiculous try at either being philosophical or actually ruining the entire thing. Finally, I was never a fan of films starting with a flashforward of the protagonist, especially in this genre. It takes away tension and suspense during the actual movie since the viewer knows the flashforward scene hasn’t happened yet.

In the end, Extraction is going to be remembered by its insane action and a fantastic lead performance by Chris Hemsworth. The latter is one of the most underrated actors working today, and he delivers not only a phenomenal physical performance but also an emotionally powerful display. The action is jaw-dropping at every level. The outstanding choreography plus the seamless editing are able to elevate the action into some of the best I’ve seen in the last few years, including a technically mind-blowing oner. The excitement levels are super high throughout the entire runtime, credit not only to the Russo brothers but also to the debutant director Sam Hargrave (who definitely leaves his mark action-wise) in making a great film. However, the focus went all to the action, making the actual story and characters suffer from formulaic storytelling, cliche backstories, and an overall lack of emotional attachment. Still, Extraction is the best Netflix original action movie of its history, so don’t miss it!

Rating: B+

[Watch] Wonder Woman FULL Movie in English 2017

Wonder Woman 2017-anita-message-developed-2017-involve-Wonder Woman-lanthimos-review-HDTV-SDDS-michael-evil-backdrop-2017-community-Wonder Woman-oren-Watch Wonder Woman Free Online-annabelle-focuses-loveless-2017-orion-Wonder Woman-sisters-showcase-2017-BDRip-earth-perpetrator-amazons-2017-roles-Wonder Woman-goodman-MPE-lawyer-7.8-traffik-2017-killer-Wonder Woman-4.2-Google Docs.jpg

[Watch] Wonder Woman FULL Movie in English 2017

Movieteam

Coordination art Department : Emyr Taylah

Stunt coordinator : Gulizar Marissa

Script layout :Eeva Anirudh

Pictures : Charron Manavi
Co-Produzent : Ayako Marrium

Executive producer : Kailey Magali

Director of supervisory art : Genevie Potvin

Produce : Milo Raza

Manufacturer : Ronsard Arub

Actress : Maely Bigot

An Amazon princess comes to the world of Man in the grips of the First World War to confront the forces of evil and bring an end to human conflict.

7.3
14401

Movie Title	Wonder Woman
Clock	127 minute
Release	2017-05-30
Quality	AVCHD 720p TVrip
Genre	Action, Adventure, Fantasy
speech	Deutsch, English
castname	Keanu Y. Renard, Wright Z. Cally, Mattson V. Larquey

[HD] [Watch] Wonder Woman FULL Movie in English 2017

Film kurz

Spent : $338,348,780

Income : $192,673,631

Group : Flucht - Chor , Erlösung - Demut , Mathematik - Linguistik , Ziel - Kampfkunst

Production Country : Norwegen

Production : Rogers Broadcasting

I'd just like to thank Patty Jenkins for making a DCIThoughtSheWasWithUniverse movie that wasn't fucking garbage.

If I'm being completely honest, the two people I went to the cinema to watch _Wonder Woman_ with and I did spend the next two hours after coming out of our screening discussing the various problems with the movie, but we also all agreed on one thing: We still loved it.

Maybe it's just the rose-coloured glasses of comparison, but I had an excellent time with _Wonder Woman_, and I'm excited to go back to the cinema and watch it, at least one more time.

It's the first time I've said that about a DC movie since _The Dark Knight Rises_.

_Final rating:★★★½ - I strongly recommend you make the time._
**The First Great DCEU Film**

This film is the origin story of Diana Prince/Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot), who was first introduced in Batman v. Superman last year. She is born and trained on Themyscira, the hidden island where the powerful warrior women known as the Amazons live. One day, Steve Trevor (Chris Pine), an American World War I spy, crashes off the coast of Themyscira and is rescued by Diana and the two team up to take down Ares, the God of War, and the Germans, who are developing a very deadly form of mustard gas. There are fantastic action sequences in this film, especially by Gal Gadot. It's amazing to see her single-handedly storm the German front, inspiring the Allies to fight with her. Gadot takes over from the legendary Linda Carter and makes the role her own. She has great chemistry with Pine. They are complete equals in this film. It's refreshing to see the female lead in a superhero film not be the love interest. The only negative part of the film are the lackluster villains. Hopefully, Wonder Woman will have more formidable foes in future films.
**DC Hits A...Bunt. But compared to the strikeouts, a bunt seems impressive.**

Wonder Woman had some things working for it--things other comic book movies have faltered on. But it had a lot of things not working for it too. The result is an average median between what works and what doesn't. While the film is spectacular within the struggling DCEU, as a stand alone film it's mediocre at best.

Diana's origin story--how she came to be and how she came to be a super hero was refreshing. It showcased the world of the Amazon warriors. It was unique in the often cookie-cutter super hero origin stories. Patty Jenkins did a good job of framing it, but I think the character's origin story dating back to the comics has always been unique in comparison to other super heroes.

The result is that the first third or so of the movie is satisfying--despite dull performances from Gal Gadot and Chris Pine (who had zero chemistry as a couple). But once we leave the confines of the island and enter the real world, the movie becomes hit or miss. WWI (that's right, WWI now, not WWII. The reason for the change in setting is never apparent) London is portrayed in a way that is almost a distraction. Yes, the world isn't white washed; diversity is a thing--a wonderful thing at that. But DC's version of Captain America's Howling Commandos consist of an Arab and an American Indian. Diversity for diversity's sake becomes distracting--especially when paired with a low-rent Simon Pegg whose soul function is being a deadly sniper who never fires his weapon (that's helpful on a top-secret mission behind enemy lines).

It's almost as if the movie telegraphs all of these unnecessary plot hiccups to remind you that this is a super hero film, and no matter how much the mortal humans fail, it will all be okay because the super hero will save the day.

The dialogue can be clichéd at times, and the final theme of the movie--one of love conquering all and the acknowledgement that, overall, mankind is good, is laughable in it's amateur preachiness.

But what the film lacks in substance and script, it makes up for in the visuals. I found the action sequences to be great fun. Heavily stylized "Matrix-style" fight scenes seem right at home in a film about super hero Gods. The freeze frames worked too--as fight sequences froze in over-the-top super hero poses that harkened back to the source material's comic book roots.

The final confrontation between Wonder Woman and Ares--while dragging on a little long--was well done, being one of the few super hero movie climaxes that delivered.

While aspects of the movie were so similar (Hell! Identical!) to Captain America: The First Avenger, I actually felt embarrassed for the filmmakers, I did come away thinking this was the movie Captain America should have been. It succeeded in places where Captain America failed miserably.

The movie is entertainment--pure, fun, pop-corn-gobbling entertainment. In that realm, it succeeds and succeeds well. But as a piece of cinematic art, it falls flat on its face with too many plot holes, script inconsistencies, clichés and mediocre acting. Wonder Woman will be an important movie for both the DCEU and the summer of 2017. But it lacks the magic and staying power of Nolan and Donner's contributions to DC comics' films.
I like the portrayal of the Greek/Amazonian myth; the part where Chris Pine is naked; the part where Wonder Woman overturns the tank; and the post-battle dance scene with her and Steve Trevor, and that's it.

This could be mistaken for a mediocre, melodramatic, cheesy TV movie. Visually, it's less interesting than any of the other nu-DC fare; I never thought I'd miss Zach Snyder's sensibility but I did in this flick. Storywise, it may be a step up from the rest of the DCEU, but it still barely rivals the worst of the Marvel movies. Gal Gadot can't act, and Chris Pine couldn't make the clunky dialogue sound not ridiculous.

Wonder Woman is tolerable. That's more than can be said for the other nu-DC movies but it's not a compliment.
I quite enjoyed this movie. When I learned that Zack Snyder had his fingers in it I got a worried since he recently wrote such atrocities as Batman vs Superman and sure enough the story is a really the weakest part of the movie. A typical nonsensical, unintelligent, Hollywood story/script were you are better off putting your brain in idle when watching it.

However it makes up for this with cool special effects and, surprisingly, quite enjoyable characters. This is definitely a movie that you watch for the sake of the special effects. Well, if you are a male teenager you might also be watching it to drool over Gal Gadot of course (I have to admit that she is hot).

There is not too much to say about the plot. Our Amazon hot chick discovers that there is a war going on and goes out to stop it. Since she has been overly protected by her guardian she is amazingly clueless about life outside of her little island. Especially aspects involving men. Something which creates some funny moments as well as some embarrassingly silly ones. This, Diana’s gradual evolution where she not only is learning about life but also discovers her considerable powers, is one of the enjoyable aspects of the movie though. It is of course also one of the dummer aspects of the movie. How the f… could the Amazon Queen race Diana to be so ignorant about everything?

Another not so enjoyable part of the movie is the ludicrous scenes where the britts are trying to obtain peace at all costs as well as the stereotypical portrayal of Ludendorff as some megalomaniacal, half crazy war-mongerer. This was just dumb. I guess Zac Snyder just picked the name out of some history book without bothering to read up on the character. Typical lack of intelligence and respect, a la Hollywood, for anything outside of their, very limited, sphere of knowledge.
Well, at least Danny Huston did a pretty decent job of the shitty role he was given. So did most of the rest of actors. I definitely liked Gal Gadot as Super Woman but then, although I am not a teenager, I am still a male so maybe I am biased when it comes to her?

I definitely liked the special effects. The showdown at the end was great as far as I am concerned and the rest not bad either. They could have been even better though if it would not have been so obvious that the Germans where mostly incompetent extras waiting for Wonder Woman to show off her gymnastics and slow motion abilities. Come on, even superhero special effects should make some pretense of being “realistic” superhero special effects.

The movie is definitely aimed at the young adult segment. Unfortunately it do not seem to know what it is aiming for. Sometimes it is almost adult, sometimes it is late teen and sometimes just so bloody TV-show silly that you’re wondering if it is aiming for even pre-teens.

Anyway, regardless of its faults I did enjoy my 2+ hour spent on this movie. Enough to give it a 4 out of 5 rating
**The Amazonian princess Diana's quest-come-self-discovery!**

From all the superhero films, this was one of the most anticipated. Mainly because of the woman oriented theme. People were desperate to see the solo woman superhero. Today, we have the great visual effects technology, that anything can be possible to bring on to the screen. And actress like Gal Gadot, even better it gets. Yes, it was a wonderful film. A simple storyline, but a well made film.

The Amazonians who are cut off from the rest of the world, is preparing for the battle if Ares returns. All these years nothing has happened, but one day a fighter pilot crash on the cost of their island. Then the princess embark a journey back with him to find, and end the Ares threat forever. But she only ends up in the WWII, and what happens in the following sequence are the rest of the film.

Who would have done a better job than Patty Jenkins. She nailed it, and so set to direct the sequel too. Even the supporting cast was good. DC's visuals always high standards and so this one. Action sequences too amazing. There's lots of changes in the character, as well as in everything. Firstly a nice superhero costume. And connections like Diana's father, the island, all pretty nicely written out. The DC universe just got extended. I can't wait to see 'Justice League'.

**8/10**
***Wonder Woman and Captain Steve Trevor seek to end WW1***

Near the end of WW1, an American spy (Chris Pine) is chased by Germans to the hidden island of Amazonian women created by Zeus to protect mankind. The princess of the island (Gal Gadot) leaves with the captain to help end the Great War and destroy Ares forever.

"Wonder Woman" (2017) combines the Wonder Woman TV series (1975-1979) with elements of “All Quiet on the Western Front” (1979), "Raiders of the Lost Ark" (1981), “The Dirty Dozen” (1967), “Captain America: The First Avenger” (2011) and “Man of Steel” (2013). It’s a well done modern superhero flick and superior to both “The First Avenger” and “Man of Steel.”

The opening paradisal island sequence is good without overstaying its welcome. The story really picks up when Captain Steve Trevor and Diana depart the island. They have great chemistry and their relationship adds human interest.

Unlike “Man of Steel,” which devolved into super-beings constantly pulverizing each other in the second half, “Wonder Woman” has the poise to take its time and establish an interesting assortment of characters. The entire midsection is great, but the last act, to be expected, comes down to two super-beings pounding each other. But at least the creators tried to add a weighty moral.

The film runs 2 hours, 21 minutes.

GRADE: B